Skip to content
Advertisement

Tag: numbers

Checking a number for parity

To check that both expressions are true, you need to use &&. Syntax expression1 && expression2 In this problem, you need to check that the number passed is positive AND even my code: test: error: java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false] at org.testng.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93) at org.testng.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:512) at org.testng.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41) at org.testng.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:51) at ru.job4j.sentence.LogicAndTest.test(LogicAndTest.java:14) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)

Is there a default type for numbers in Java

If I write something like this Which type has the ’18’? Is it int or byte? Or doesn’t it have a type yet? It can’t be int, because something like this is correct: And this is incorrect: EDIT: I think I found the right part in the spec at Assignment Conversion : The compile-time narrowing of constants means that code

Calculate average of a huge long array

I’m trying to calculate the average of many (more than 200) long (primitive type) values stored in an array. Usually you add all the numbers and divide it by the number of the values. But this is not possible in this case since there is no primitive datatype in Java capable of holding such a large number, isn’t it? Will

Convert Java Number to BigDecimal : best way

I am looking for the best way to convert a Number to a BigDecimal. Is this good enough? Can we lose precision with the toString() method ? Answer This is fine, remember that using the constructor of BigDecimal to declare a value can be dangerous when it’s not of type String. Consider the below… This will not print 0.35, it

Advertisement