I see a few people having this issue and am struggling for a few weeks now, but not able to run both JUnit4 and JUnit5 on the same project (I need this to maintain some old tests). I noticed that if I remove the maven surefire plugin I can run the JUnit4 tests whereas when it’s added to the POM
Tag: junit
Hierarchical Visitor Pattern and State Management
I am trying to find a good way to manage state with the hierarchical visitor pattern and ANTLRs autogenerated base visitor class. While the example below is something silly I made up, I believe it helps get the point across about which concepts I would like to address. As an example lets say we have a class: Now note that
Trying to mock IntConsumer with Mockito fails
I’m trying to mock IntConsumer: and it fails on the ‘verify’ with below error code: Method threw ‘org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException’ exception. Cannot evaluate $java.util.function.IntConsumer$$EnhancerByMockitoWithCGLIB$$3ee084c4.toString() Answer You need to tell Mockito what method it is supposed to verify on the IntConsumer mock. Your verification code should look something like: See for example the tutorial at Baeldung.
Ignoring only embedded member in AssertJ
I have two classes to test with JUnit/Mockito: Then in my test class, using AssertJ: The problem is that the name sk is in both classes, and I need to ignore it only in ClassA, not in ClassB. Is this possible in AssertJ? Answer According to the ignoringFields javadoc: Nested fields can be specified like this: home.address.street. …so with your
Micronaut HTTP Client – Deserialize generic type – For API Testing
For API testing I have to parse the response of a request using io.micronaut.http.client.HttpClient I prefer to use the format given below. But It is not working. I am getting type cast error while trying to fetch User from response Currently I am using ObjectMapper (Jackson) like given below, Is there any way to use TypeReference directly with HttpClient retrieve
How to tests and mock mapstruct converter?
I’m using MapStruct framework on my java Gradle project, and it works perfectly but I just want to test : MapStruct generated sources (converter) service class (calls MapStruct’s converter) I have tried to use another topic to do this but it is not working for me. This is my MapStruct interface : This is my service class : When I’m
JUnit: assert collection contains an element with a certain property
I want to assert (using JUnit and not any other dependencies like hamcrest) if a collection contains an element with a certain property value). I found this question How do I assert an Iterable contains elements with a certain property? using harmcrest. One option is to override the equals method to check only the property that I want to compare,
Is it possible to access instance of exception “catched” with JUnit Rule ExpectedException?
Suppose that in a test is: and some test contains: Now if there is a need to inspect this SomeNastyException more detailed what would be the way? Of course it would be possible just not to use ExcpectedException and wrap call with try/catch and then inspect the exception in any way it is needed but now question is about can
UnsatisfiedDependencyException: Error creating bean with name ‘repository.BookRepositoryTest’ in Junit Test
I am writing a junit test for spring data repository. But i can’t autowire repository interface. Program is running if i run main method and spring can detect all repositories,services,entities but if i run a test it gives this error : UnsatisfiedDependencyException: Error creating bean with name ‘repository.BookRepositoryTest’: Unsatisfied dependency expressed through field ‘bookRepository’; nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No qualifying
JUnit5: Specify order of execution of multiple @Nested classes
Does Junit5 give any guarantees regarding execution order of @Nested classes defined within the same parent? With a trivial example I made, I notice the tests are executed in reverse order of declaration, but this behavior is neither documented (or is it?) nor consistent with how @Test annotated methods are ordered by default. It’s also quite annoying, because obviously I’d