I’m on jOOQ 3.13.1, dropwizard 2.0.7. To make jOOQ and dropwizard together, I am using (https://droptools.bendb.com/jooq/). I am using custom generation strategy to maintain camel case for my setters and getters. The names are coming in as expected.
The record objects have data for their respective columns. However, I keep on getting errors from my database that I am trying to set “null” on a non-null column.
I see this issue only when I am trying to create a new record. Updating records work just fine.
ERROR [2021-03-18 14:58:05,363] com.bendb.dropwizard.jooq.jersey.LoggingDataAccessExceptionMapper: Error handling a request: 9f65c0316d996ebb ! org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: null value in column "createdAt" of relation "failures" violates not-null constraint ! Detail: Failing row contains (265, null, Some callback, User account not found, null, null, null).
If I print the record, it looks like this:
+------+------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------+------------------------------+------------------------------+------+ | id|userId|action |error |createdAt |updatedAt |status| +------+------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------+------------------------------+------------------------------+------+ |{null}|{null}|*Some callback|*User account not found|*2021-03-18 14:58:05,363|*2021-03-18 14:58:05,363|{null}| +------+------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------+------------------------------+------------------------------+------+
My getter names are: “getId”, “getUserId”, “getAction”, “getError”, “getCreatedAt”, “getUpdatedAt”, “getStatus”.
For columns that are in lowercase, I see no issues. The issue if for places where the column names are in CamelCase.
The class looks something like:
public class FailureDao { private final DSLContext database; public FailureDao(DSLContext database) { this.database = database; } public void storeFailure(FailureRecord failure) { database.newRecord(FAILURES, failure).store(); } }
For code generation, I am following the documentation here https://www.jooq.org/doc/3.13/manual/code-generation/codegen-generatorstrategy/
My generator class looks something like:
public class AsInDatabaseStrategy extends DefaultGeneratorStrategy { @Override public String getJavaIdentifier(Definition definition) { return definition.getOutputName().toUpperCase(); } @Override public String getJavaSetterName(Definition definition, Mode mode) { return "set" + StringUtils.toUC(definition.getOutputName()); } @Override public String getJavaGetterName(Definition definition, Mode mode) { return "get" + StringUtils.toUC(definition.getOutputName()); } }
Advertisement
Answer
I found the issue. Turns out, it was explained on https://groups.google.com/g/jooq-user/c/1iy0EdWe_T8/m/YN9PEsIF4lcJ. My workaround was to use a jOOQ generated POJO. To create a new record, instead of passing an object of Record class, I am now passing an object of the POJO class.