I have a scenario which I have somehow simulated into the following: I have a list of Callable tasks that are being executed in 4 threads. The execution should return a value(a Map<String, String>). Each task has an item attribute. If for a task I get timeout (I have a Timeout flag in a Map<> that each Callable returns) or
Tag: threadpoolexecutor
how to understand this interface Executor example in Java API docs [closed]
Can anyone help to explain this piece of code in details? class SerialExecutor implements Executor { final Queue tasks = new ArrayDeque(); final Executor …
Impossible to make a cached thread pool with a size limit?
It seems to be impossible to make a cached thread pool with a limit to the number of threads that it can create. Here is how static Executors.newCachedThreadPool is implemented in the standard Java …
Executors.newCachedThreadPool() versus Executors.newFixedThreadPool()
newCachedThreadPool() versus newFixedThreadPool() When should I use one or the other? Which strategy is better in terms of resource utilization?